Prompt: can it be more specific
- Skepticism and Animal Feed
- Auron
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:47 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
Prompt: can it be more specific
Suppose we have the following situation. You write a tossup on "Finnish communists". As your first clue, you discuss a super-obscure group of Finnish Maoists. As your second clue, you mention a group of Finnish Trotskyists.
A player who didn't know anything about clue 1 buzzes on clue 2 and answers "Communists". He is prompted. He says "Trotskyites", as he guesses that the TU is going for a particular type of Communist. He is negged.
Suppose that, instead, the moderator had said "I need a country" rather than just "prompt". The player probably would not have negged, but would still be forced to display real knowledge before getting points.
In common links like these (where there might be ambiguity as to the characteristic by which the group is defined), should we authorize moderators to make more specific prompts such as "I need a country"? Presumably we could include things like "ask for country if "Communists" is given" so that this process is automatic and moderators don't abuse this or exercise it poorly.
A player who didn't know anything about clue 1 buzzes on clue 2 and answers "Communists". He is prompted. He says "Trotskyites", as he guesses that the TU is going for a particular type of Communist. He is negged.
Suppose that, instead, the moderator had said "I need a country" rather than just "prompt". The player probably would not have negged, but would still be forced to display real knowledge before getting points.
In common links like these (where there might be ambiguity as to the characteristic by which the group is defined), should we authorize moderators to make more specific prompts such as "I need a country"? Presumably we could include things like "ask for country if "Communists" is given" so that this process is automatic and moderators don't abuse this or exercise it poorly.
Bruce
Harvard '10 / UChicago '07 / Roycemore School '04
ACF Member emeritus
My guide to using Wikipedia as a question source
Harvard '10 / UChicago '07 / Roycemore School '04
ACF Member emeritus
My guide to using Wikipedia as a question source
- grapesmoker
- Sin
- Posts: 6345
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Seems like if you anticipate your question being that vague but you're still hellbent on writing it, you could start with a statement like "country and group required," or something of that nature. Probably a better idea is just to write a different question.
Jerry Vinokurov
ex-LJHS, ex-Berkeley, ex-Brown, sorta-ex-CMU
presently: John Jay College Economics
code ape, loud voice, general nuissance
ex-LJHS, ex-Berkeley, ex-Brown, sorta-ex-CMU
presently: John Jay College Economics
code ape, loud voice, general nuissance
- Sima Guang Hater
- Auron
- Posts: 1965
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:43 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Unless it specifies to give a country in that instance, I think you could just write a question on "communists" using only clues about Finland. Also, whenever I write a question like that, I usually tell the moderator to accept things like "Trotskyists", "Maoists", etc, if the clues in isolation apply to them.
Eric Mukherjee, MD PhD
Brown 2009, Penn Med 2018
Instructor/Attending Physician/Postdoctoral Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Coach, University School of Nashville
“The next generation will always surpass the previous one. It’s one of the never-ending cycles in life.”
Support the Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Foundation
Brown 2009, Penn Med 2018
Instructor/Attending Physician/Postdoctoral Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Coach, University School of Nashville
“The next generation will always surpass the previous one. It’s one of the never-ending cycles in life.”
Support the Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Foundation
- Skepticism and Animal Feed
- Auron
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:47 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
This seems like a worthy idea; I might try it out at Spring Offensive and see if it works.grapesmoker wrote:Seems like if you anticipate your question being that vague but you're still hellbent on writing it, you could start with a statement like "country and group required," or something of that nature. Probably a better idea is just to write a different question.
@Eric: in this case, we're assuming that the question is flawed. Obviously perfect questions eliminate this problem.
Bruce
Harvard '10 / UChicago '07 / Roycemore School '04
ACF Member emeritus
My guide to using Wikipedia as a question source
Harvard '10 / UChicago '07 / Roycemore School '04
ACF Member emeritus
My guide to using Wikipedia as a question source
- stevebahnaman
- Wakka
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:25 pm
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
The question for me as a moderator is more philosophical. Like, I didn't write the question. I don't want to screw the players over because the answer line is weird. *Should* it be okay to give a more specific prompt under this circumstance?
Steve Bahnaman, Campbell University
Commissioner, Online Quiz League USA (quizcentral.net)
NC Wesleyan College, Librarian and Quiz Bowl Advisor/Coach 2009-2011
Emory Academic Team, 1999-2004
Pretty trashy
Commissioner, Online Quiz League USA (quizcentral.net)
NC Wesleyan College, Librarian and Quiz Bowl Advisor/Coach 2009-2011
Emory Academic Team, 1999-2004
Pretty trashy
- DumbJaques
- Forums Staff: Administrator
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:21 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Hey, this is a great topic - I think this is an area where we can rather simply enact some serious improvements in the game, and decrease significantly the amount of times people get punished for knowledge.
At Titanomachy at Maryland two years ago, Andrew Lim buzzed in on a Sicilian Expedition question off of clues about the siege of Syracuse and answered "siege of Syracuse." The reader just happened to be Matt Weiner, noted author of said tournament, and he prompted him with "can you be less specific." I can't see any reason why this kind of thing would be a problem, since you're talking about cases in which a person is demonstrating precise but incomplete knowledge. Sure, it's valid to say that you should just stop writing those fucking "Bosnian microbiologists" questions (and, you sure should!) and just use normal answer lines with clues from a specific field or nationality or whatever, but there are plenty of examples (like the Sicilian expedition) where a bit more flexible definition of the prompt would be a boon.
At Titanomachy at Maryland two years ago, Andrew Lim buzzed in on a Sicilian Expedition question off of clues about the siege of Syracuse and answered "siege of Syracuse." The reader just happened to be Matt Weiner, noted author of said tournament, and he prompted him with "can you be less specific." I can't see any reason why this kind of thing would be a problem, since you're talking about cases in which a person is demonstrating precise but incomplete knowledge. Sure, it's valid to say that you should just stop writing those fucking "Bosnian microbiologists" questions (and, you sure should!) and just use normal answer lines with clues from a specific field or nationality or whatever, but there are plenty of examples (like the Sicilian expedition) where a bit more flexible definition of the prompt would be a boon.
Chris Ray
OSU
University of Chicago, 2016
University of Maryland, 2014
ACF, PACE
OSU
University of Chicago, 2016
University of Maryland, 2014
ACF, PACE
- Mike Bentley
- Sin
- Posts: 6465
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Bellevue, WA
- Contact:
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
I got an idea today that it might be possible to use the Review feature in Word to provide more specific prompting. Essentially, this feature lets you highlight individual clues and add a comment to them saying "Accept so and so" or "Prompt on so and so" that apply on to the highlighted portion of text. Things get a little messy when these comments overlap, but if you click a specific comment it will show you precisely what portion of the question the comment applies to.
I think this system could potentially be used to make a moderator's life easier as well. Instead of having something in the answer line like ("accept early buzzes of X"), you could just highlight the portion of text where X is an acceptable answer.
This also solves some problems of giving more specific answers for common link tossups. For instance, take that tossup on "Freedom of Religion" from Bruce's history tournament in 2008. The clue on the Edict of Nantes could be highlighted to say "prompt on Freedom to be a Huguenot". That way you avoid penalizing people who know what the Edict of Nantes is but are failing to put it in the context of earlier clues.
I think this system could potentially be used to make a moderator's life easier as well. Instead of having something in the answer line like ("accept early buzzes of X"), you could just highlight the portion of text where X is an acceptable answer.
This also solves some problems of giving more specific answers for common link tossups. For instance, take that tossup on "Freedom of Religion" from Bruce's history tournament in 2008. The clue on the Edict of Nantes could be highlighted to say "prompt on Freedom to be a Huguenot". That way you avoid penalizing people who know what the Edict of Nantes is but are failing to put it in the context of earlier clues.
Mike Bentley
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008
- grapesmoker
- Sin
- Posts: 6345
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Why can't you just add the "prompt on" part to the answer line like normal? I don't see what this Word review feature adds and it makes portability a pain in the ass. I encourage people to avoid advanced Word features whenever possible.
Jerry Vinokurov
ex-LJHS, ex-Berkeley, ex-Brown, sorta-ex-CMU
presently: John Jay College Economics
code ape, loud voice, general nuissance
ex-LJHS, ex-Berkeley, ex-Brown, sorta-ex-CMU
presently: John Jay College Economics
code ape, loud voice, general nuissance
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
I like the idea—I agree with Mike that it makes noting what parts of the question correspond to what parts of the answer line a bit easier—but I also think Jerry's concern is inhibitory: it's a very nonportable solution, and in my experience most editing doesn't take place in Word anyway, so it's extra work that would have to be done at a juncture in the editing process that is usually pretty rushed anyway.
Jonah Greenthal
National Academic Quiz Tournaments
National Academic Quiz Tournaments
- Mechanical Beasts
- Banned Cheater
- Posts: 5673
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Yeah, Jerry's right. I am 100% against a solution that a moderator could very easily screw up (if he doesn't know he should mouse-over the clue whereever the player buzzed, you're fucked) when there is an equivalent solution that just writes some damn words on the page. It is much harder to fuck up damn words on the page.
Andrew Watkins
- Mike Bentley
- Sin
- Posts: 6465
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Bellevue, WA
- Contact:
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
I have perhaps overstated the difficulty of seeing these prompts. Here's a screenshot:
In this case it's very clear what the moderator should do. The benefit would be in a common-link style question where there are a bunch of "accept this, but don't accept this except on buzzes on that" things in the answer line.
Regarding portability, this feature does also exist in OpenOffice Writer (see http://open-tube.com/openoffice-writer- ... lternative). Its lack of support in Google Docs could be a deal breaker, though. Seeing as how most tournaments still do use Word or some equivalent to generate the final version of the packets, though, it would still be feasible to add these in if desired.
In this case it's very clear what the moderator should do. The benefit would be in a common-link style question where there are a bunch of "accept this, but don't accept this except on buzzes on that" things in the answer line.
Regarding portability, this feature does also exist in OpenOffice Writer (see http://open-tube.com/openoffice-writer- ... lternative). Its lack of support in Google Docs could be a deal breaker, though. Seeing as how most tournaments still do use Word or some equivalent to generate the final version of the packets, though, it would still be feasible to add these in if desired.
Mike Bentley
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
What about the tourneys that read off paper?
Fred Morlan
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, CEO, co-owner
former PACE member, president, etc.
former hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, CEO, co-owner
former PACE member, president, etc.
former hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
- Jesus vs. Dragons
- Tidus
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:04 pm
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
What is this paper you speak of?The Granny wrote:What about the tourneys that read off paper?
Ethan Hewett
UF 2013
Chipola College 2010
Sneads High School 2009
UF 2013
Chipola College 2010
Sneads High School 2009
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
The substance which was used for the packets for 2009 ACF Nationals, and NAQT tournaments.Jesus vs. Dragons wrote:What is this paper you speak of?The Granny wrote:What about the tourneys that read off paper?
- Mike Bentley
- Sin
- Posts: 6465
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Bellevue, WA
- Contact:
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
While I think you can print out questions with these comments, they don't look very good that way, so I guess that's a valid point against them.
Mike Bentley
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
I don't think this is a great idea generally (if you've written a question where there are different alternate answers acceptable in overlapping regions and the best way to make it clear to the moderator is to use comments, everyone's going to be better off if you rewrite the question so that's no longer the case). Also, I know from bitter experience that some aspects of trackback/review are not compatible between different versions of Word (or perhaps different versions of Word running on different OSes?); I'm not sure if that's true of comments, but if it is, that's one more log on the compatibility issues fire.
Susan
UChicago alum (AB 2003, PhD 2009)
Member emerita, ACF
UChicago alum (AB 2003, PhD 2009)
Member emerita, ACF
- Not That Kind of Christian!!
- Yuna
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:36 pm
- Location: Manhattan
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Why is it not clear enough to simply put on the answer line [prompt on X before mention of Y] or [accept X before Y is mentioned]? That's seemed to work pretty well, and any question that would require many complicated prompt permutations is probably not so hot a question anyhow.
Hannah Kirsch
Brandeis University 2010
NYU School of Medicine 2014
"Wow, those Scandinavians completely thorbjorned my hard-earned political capital."
Brandeis University 2010
NYU School of Medicine 2014
"Wow, those Scandinavians completely thorbjorned my hard-earned political capital."
- Quantum Mushroom Billiard Hat
- Rikku
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:16 pm
- Location: Midland, MI
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
If the goal is just to make it easier to find Y in an answer line of [prompt on X before mention of Y], you could just highlight Y in some unobtrusive color.
I'm not sure if that's any better than without the highlight, but it seems simpler than using the comment tool and is unlikely to have compatibility issues.
I'm not sure if that's any better than without the highlight, but it seems simpler than using the comment tool and is unlikely to have compatibility issues.
Michael Hausinger
Coach, Bay City Western High School
formerly of University of Michigan and East Lansing High School
Coach, Bay City Western High School
formerly of University of Michigan and East Lansing High School
- Jesus vs. Dragons
- Tidus
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:04 pm
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
I think the problem with prompts is that a lot of the time you are left wondering what the prompt is going for. To use Bruce's example, who would know to go from "Trotskyists" to "Finnish Communists"? This answer space is pretty clearly intended for a high level of difficulty, but I would imagine most people who buzz in would go something like this:
BUZZ: Communists
Prompt
Trotskyists
I don't think I can take that
At which point the moderator and player would be thoroughly confused. If the situation were reversed, would a "reverse prompt" be in order to get the players train of thought back from the specific form of Communism to general Communism to Communists of a specific nationality? I personally don't think that writing it off as "this would be a bad question, so lets just avoid it" is very conducive, although it is the best option. If a question like this is going to be written, and many have already been written, shouldn't we discuss ways to make it easier to resolve for the future? I can see how saying Trotskyists would be incorrect, as the clue before it gave info on Maoists, but shouldn't displaying knowledge that deep in a subject be rewarded with points? I may be able to think of some examples from different genres tomorrow to help solidify opinions.
BUZZ: Communists
Prompt
Trotskyists
I don't think I can take that
At which point the moderator and player would be thoroughly confused. If the situation were reversed, would a "reverse prompt" be in order to get the players train of thought back from the specific form of Communism to general Communism to Communists of a specific nationality? I personally don't think that writing it off as "this would be a bad question, so lets just avoid it" is very conducive, although it is the best option. If a question like this is going to be written, and many have already been written, shouldn't we discuss ways to make it easier to resolve for the future? I can see how saying Trotskyists would be incorrect, as the clue before it gave info on Maoists, but shouldn't displaying knowledge that deep in a subject be rewarded with points? I may be able to think of some examples from different genres tomorrow to help solidify opinions.
Ethan Hewett
UF 2013
Chipola College 2010
Sneads High School 2009
UF 2013
Chipola College 2010
Sneads High School 2009
- Captain Sinico
- Auron
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 1:46 pm
- Location: Champaign, Illinois
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Very conducive of what, exactly? I claim that most of the situations in which the pseudo-problem of requiring a directed prompt occurs arise from ill-posed questions, i.e. ones from which no unique answer is derivable from sufficiently large sets of clues. Such questions are bad and we should just avoid writing them. That's my advice: if you find you think your question might require a directed prompt, fix it so it doesn't.Jesus vs. Dragons wrote:I personally don't think that writing it off as "this would be a bad question, so lets just avoid it" is very conducive...
M
Mike Sorice
Former Coach, Centennial High School of Champaign, IL (2014-2020) & Team Illinois (2016-2018)
Alumnus, Illinois ABT (2000-2002; 2003-2009) & Fenwick Scholastic Bowl (1999-2000)
Member, ACF (Emeritus), IHSSBCA, & PACE
Former Coach, Centennial High School of Champaign, IL (2014-2020) & Team Illinois (2016-2018)
Alumnus, Illinois ABT (2000-2002; 2003-2009) & Fenwick Scholastic Bowl (1999-2000)
Member, ACF (Emeritus), IHSSBCA, & PACE
- grapesmoker
- Sin
- Posts: 6345
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Or be clear about what you're looking for up front. To use a trash example, "Team and year required." Extrapolate as necessary to your application.Captain Sinico wrote: That's my advice: if you find you think your question might require a directed prompt, fix it so it doesn't.
Jerry Vinokurov
ex-LJHS, ex-Berkeley, ex-Brown, sorta-ex-CMU
presently: John Jay College Economics
code ape, loud voice, general nuissance
ex-LJHS, ex-Berkeley, ex-Brown, sorta-ex-CMU
presently: John Jay College Economics
code ape, loud voice, general nuissance
- Not That Kind of Christian!!
- Yuna
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:36 pm
- Location: Manhattan
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Exactly. Obviously, prompts that direct one to accept an alternate name before that alternate name is mentioned are not indicative of a bad question. But if you're writing your tossup and thinking, "Hmm, half of this stuff could be a hose for Trotskyists instead of Finnish communists. Better make lots of prompts!" then you should write your tossup in such a way that it's clear that a nation is involved, or just make all our lives easier and write it on some other facet of communism.grapesmoker wrote:Or be clear about what you're looking for up front. To use a trash example, "Team and year required." Extrapolate as necessary to your application.Captain Sinico wrote: That's my advice: if you find you think your question might require a directed prompt, fix it so it doesn't.
Hannah Kirsch
Brandeis University 2010
NYU School of Medicine 2014
"Wow, those Scandinavians completely thorbjorned my hard-earned political capital."
Brandeis University 2010
NYU School of Medicine 2014
"Wow, those Scandinavians completely thorbjorned my hard-earned political capital."
- Duncan Idaho
- Rikku
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:07 pm
- Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
Along the same line, you could use a model from music tossups, like "One work of this type by this composer" for Smetana operas (NSC 2009). In this situation, perhaps it could be adapted to "these types of people from this country."grapesmoker wrote:Or be clear about what you're looking for up front. To use a trash example, "Team and year required." Extrapolate as necessary to your application.
Ben Cole, Southside '10, George Mason '14
nothing which we are to perceive in this world equals/ the power of your intense fragility:
"I'll also note the humor in me defending high schoolers from Matt Bollinger." - Mike Cheyne
nothing which we are to perceive in this world equals/ the power of your intense fragility:
"I'll also note the humor in me defending high schoolers from Matt Bollinger." - Mike Cheyne
- Coelacanth
- Rikku
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
Re: Prompt: can it be more specific
It does seem that we're talking about solutions in search of a problem here.Quantum Mushroom Billiard Hat wrote:If the goal is just to make it easier to find Y in an answer line of [prompt on X before mention of Y], you could just highlight Y in some unobtrusive color.
I'm not sure if that's any better than without the highlight, but it seems simpler than using the comment tool and is unlikely to have compatibility issues.
For me personally, if I am reading packets from a screen (as opposed to paper) there is absolutely no way I'm going to leave comments on. I cannot stand reading with all those squiggly red underlines and pop-up comment boxes everywhere.
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things. More, I cannot say.
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things. More, I cannot say.