NAQT distributions posted

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
Locked
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 6113
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area »

NAQT is pleased to announce that our distribution is now available on naqt.com.

High school distribution
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
User avatar
at your pleasure
Auron
Posts: 1723
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:56 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by at your pleasure »

I personally think that lit and myth should be split to 4/4 lit and 1/1 myth, which garuantees a reasonable balance between lit and myth. Still, I'm glad to see NAQT make itself more transparent by doing stuff like this.
Douglas Graebner, Walt Whitman HS 10, Uchicago 14
"... imagination acts upon man as really as does gravitation, and may kill him as certainly as a dose of prussic acid."-Sir James Frazer,The Golden Bough

http://avorticistking.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Sen. Estes Kefauver (D-TN)
Chairman of Anti-Music Mafia Committee
Posts: 5647
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:46 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Sen. Estes Kefauver (D-TN) »

I appreciate this move towards openness in your new role with NAQT, and look forward to more. THank you Jeff.
Charlie Dees, North Kansas City HS '08
"I won't say more because I know some of you parse everything I say." - Jeremy Gibbs

"At one TJ tournament the neg prize was the Hampshire College ultimate frisbee team (nude) calender featuring one Evan Silberman. In retrospect that could have been a disaster." - Harry White
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 6113
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area »

Anti-Climacus wrote:I personally think that lit and myth should be split to 4/4 lit and 1/1 myth, which garuantees a reasonable balance between lit and myth.
Do you mean balance between packets within a tournament set?

If so, we already do this:

For IS #76:

Round (Myth, Religious Literature, Non-myth Non-religious Literature)

1 (1/1, -, 4/3)
2 (1/1, -, 3/4)
3 (0/1, -, 5/3)
4 (1/0, -, 3/5)
5 (1/1, -, 4/3)
6 (0/1, -, 4/4)
7 (-, 1/0, 4/4)
8 (1/0, 0/1, 3/4)
9 (0/1, -, 5/3)
10 (1/0, 0/1, 3/4)
11 (-, 1/0, 4/4)
12 (-, 0/1, 4/4)
13 (0/1, 1/0, 4/3)
14 (-, 1/0, 3/5)
15 (-, 0/1, 4/4)

This looks slightly suboptimal to me, in that the religion tends toward the end of the tournament and the myth towards the beginning, and in that some rounds have 1/1 myth and some have nothing; but I don't believe it's wildly out of balance.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
User avatar
TheCzarMan
Tidus
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Bloomfield, New Jersey

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by TheCzarMan »

I don't like the Science Dist., could go elsewhere to Fine Arts or Social Science.
Nick Petrilli
Bloomfield High School 2009
Freelance/Mercenary Moderator, TD, Player, and Reader
User avatar
Matt Weiner
Sin
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Matt Weiner »

Thanks for doing this.

I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
Matt Weiner
Advisor to Quizbowl at Virginia Commonwealth University / Founder of hsquizbowl.org
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 6113
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area »

Matt Weiner wrote:Thanks for doing this.

I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
HSNCT uses the same weights as the posted distribution. I've asked R. to add this clarification.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
User avatar
AlphaQuizBowler
Tidus
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: Alpharetta, GA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by AlphaQuizBowler »

That's a bit too much science and, if myth is in with lit, not enough lit, in my opinion.
William
Alpharetta High School '11
Harvard '15
User avatar
Stained Diviner
Auron
Posts: 5085
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Chicagoland
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Stained Diviner »

Thank you very much for posting this and engaging in this discussion--there is a good discussion going on in the college section.

My biggest complaint about the distribution is the PC_Sport 1.7/1.7. Getting that down to 1/1 would be an improvement, and the extra questions could go into any category.
David Reinstein
Head Writer and Editor for Scobol Solo, Masonics, and IESA; TD for Scobol Solo and Reinstein Varsity; IHSSBCA Board Member; IHSSBCA Chair (2004-2014); PACE President (2016-2018)
User avatar
Blackboard Monitor Vimes
Auron
Posts: 2362
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Blackboard Monitor Vimes »

Shcool wrote:Thank you very much for posting this and engaging in this discussion--there is a good discussion going on in the college section.

My biggest complaint about the distribution is the PC_Sport 1.7/1.7. Getting that down to 1/1 would be an improvement, and the extra questions could go into any category.
The extra questions could go into lit, which is grossly underrepresented compared to history and science given that religion and myth are shoved into that distribution currently.
Sam L,
Maggie L. Walker Governor's School 2010 / UVA 2014 / VCU School of Education 2016
PACE
User avatar
cvdwightw
Auron
Posts: 3291
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:46 am
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by cvdwightw »

Initially I thought the huge increase in the science weights was due to mathcalc, but it's not. I agree with reducing the science distribution to something like 78/68 (eliminating 4 mathcalc and 12/12 proportional to current weights). The resulting 16/12 could be funneled mostly into literature to give that equal standing with history, with the rest spread across other categories. I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
Dwight Wynne
socalquizbowl.org
UC Irvine 2008-2013; UCLA 2004-2007; Capistrano Valley High School 2000-2003

"It's a competition, but it's not a sport. On a scale, if football is a 10, then rowing would be a two. One would be Quiz Bowl." --Matt Birk on rowing, SI On Campus, 10/21/03

"If you were my teammate, I would have tossed your ass out the door so fast you'd be emitting Cerenkov radiation, but I'm not classy like Dwight." --Jerry
User avatar
Mechanical Beasts
Banned Cheater
Posts: 5673
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Mechanical Beasts »

cvdwightw wrote:I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
This. Moreover, I can even understand not giving world lit 1/1 per packet at this level, but I can't understand giving it 2/2 per tournament. Unless 4/4 of misc lit is shadow world lit, I think that can stand to be increased a bit.
Andrew Watkins
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 6113
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area »

everyday847 wrote:
cvdwightw wrote:I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
This. Moreover, I can even understand not giving world lit 1/1 per packet at this level, but I can't understand giving it 2/2 per tournament. Unless 4/4 of misc lit is shadow world lit, I think that can stand to be increased a bit.
At least some of it is shadow world lit; but it is also a long-standing trend in our feedback that people are not, in fact, converting literature questions at the same rate as history and science. Continental European and non-Western literature have been particular problem areas (yes, this includes those A-series Stendhal tossups we were talking about a while back).
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15782
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by AKKOLADE »

Thank you for posting the distribution on both the high school and the college levels, NAQT. I really appreciate this move towards openness.
Fred Morlan
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, CEO, co-owner
former PACE member, president, etc.
former hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
User avatar
Huang
Rikku
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:29 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Huang »

It's disappointing to see Computation/Geography/"Sports"/Current Events/General Knowledge comprise 7.9/7 of a NAQT packet. Out of these 5 categories, "sport"'s distribution of 1.7/1.7 undercuts the "A" in NAQT the most. Why can't geography be reduced to 1/1 and "sports"/current events/general knowledge form 1/1 of a packet? Or am I unaware of certain requirements NAQT must fulfill?
Sandy
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 6113
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area »

bt_green_warbler wrote:
Matt Weiner wrote:I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
HSNCT uses the same weights as the posted distribution. I've asked R. to add this clarification.
R. informs me that while the weights for HSNCT are in fact very similar to the IS distribution, the HSNCT distribution shares certain features with our college distribution (notably the split of philosophy questions to ensure balance among eras).

Therefore we've posted a third page with the complete HSNCT distribution.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
User avatar
The Laughing Man
Lulu
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 4:57 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by The Laughing Man »

everyday847 wrote:
cvdwightw wrote:I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
This. Moreover, I can even understand not giving world lit 1/1 per packet at this level, but I can't understand giving it 2/2 per tournament. Unless 4/4 of misc lit is shadow world lit, I think that can stand to be increased a bit.
Especially at HSNCT, the field is strong enough that there is convertable world lit that there should be at the very least .5/.5 world lit per round. Really, I think at HSNCT American, English, Continental and World could be roughly equal without hurting conversion too much.
Ben, State College '09
Swarthmore '13
User avatar
First Chairman
Auron
Posts: 3651
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 8:21 pm
Location: Fairfax VA
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by First Chairman »

bt_green_warbler wrote:NAQT is pleased to announce that our distribution is now available on naqt.com.

High school distribution
If it hasn't been said enough (and it should be said more), thank you.
Emil Thomas Chuck, Ph.D.
Founder, PACE
Facebook junkie and unofficial advisor to aspiring health professionals in quiz bowl
---
Pimping Green Tea Ginger Ale (Canada Dry)
User avatar
Matt Weiner
Sin
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Matt Weiner »

The Laughing Man wrote: Really, I think at HSNCT American, English, Continental and World could be roughly equal without hurting conversion too much.
That's more than even collegiate distributions do--world lit is 1/1 in ACF and ACF-like distros, but that's out of 5/5 including the extra 1/1 lit for tiebreakers. I'm not sure I would want to write 18/18 world lit for HSNCT or NSC; I think there are some problems with conversion when you get to that much. With that said, yeah, only 2/2 per tournament is far too little.
Matt Weiner
Advisor to Quizbowl at Virginia Commonwealth University / Founder of hsquizbowl.org
User avatar
Mechanical Beasts
Banned Cheater
Posts: 5673
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Mechanical Beasts »

Matt Weiner wrote:
The Laughing Man wrote: Really, I think at HSNCT American, English, Continental and World could be roughly equal without hurting conversion too much.
That's more than even collegiate distributions do--world lit is 1/1 in ACF and ACF-like distros, but that's out of 5/5 including the extra 1/1 lit for tiebreakers. I'm not sure I would want to write 18/18 world lit for HSNCT or NSC; I think there are some problems with conversion when you get to that much. With that said, yeah, only 2/2 per tournament is far too little.
You forget that State College gets fed up when 62: A Model Kit appears in the leadin to that oh-so-easy Cortazar tossup. (I mean, hasn't every high school team read Around the Day in Eighty Worlds?)

Snark aside: yeah, I agree. Having planned out world lit for HFT with Kyle, 10/10 was around the boundary of what felt comfortable, and even then it felt like there were too many common-link-on-a-country questions.
Andrew Watkins
User avatar
Blackboard Monitor Vimes
Auron
Posts: 2362
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Blackboard Monitor Vimes »

bt_green_warbler wrote:
bt_green_warbler wrote:
Matt Weiner wrote:I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
HSNCT uses the same weights as the posted distribution. I've asked R. to add this clarification.
R. informs me that while the weights for HSNCT are in fact very similar to the IS distribution, the HSNCT distribution shares certain features with our college distribution (notably the split of philosophy questions to ensure balance among eras).

Therefore we've posted a third page with the complete HSNCT distribution.
Glad to finally be able to see these, but why on earth is there more current events than fine arts, especially at HSNCT?
Sam L,
Maggie L. Walker Governor's School 2010 / UVA 2014 / VCU School of Education 2016
PACE
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 6113
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area »

MLWGS-Gir wrote:why on earth is there more current events than fine arts, especially at HSNCT?
Some of the contributing factors here:

1. NAQT believes that our IS distribution and HSNCT distribution should be broadly similar, to ensure the fairness of qualification. (Consider here the case of a marginal HSNCT team that is strong in fine arts: if the HSNCT were significantly shifted, they could justifiably claim that they would perform better at HSNCT than a team that qualified ahead of them by answering that extra current events tossup.)

2. Fine arts, like philosophy and social science, sees consistently weak conversion numbers at lower levels of difficulty.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
User avatar
Matt Weiner
Sin
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Matt Weiner »

bt_green_warbler wrote:Consider here the case of a marginal HSNCT team that is strong in fine arts: if the HSNCT were significantly shifted, they could justifiably claim that they would perform better at HSNCT than a team that qualified ahead of them by answering that extra current events tossup that would go by the wayside at the more difficult tounament.
I'll split this off to a new thread if you think it's too far afield a topic, but I disagree with this reasoning. It seems that, in reality, any team that consistently misses out on a qualification spot by a one-question swing in a single game will either qualify anyway at a different tournament*, or be accepted for a wild-card bid. Thus, I do not think the above hypothetical is a convincing argument against bifurcating the IS and HSNCT distributions.

*Since, under your scenario, this team must finish in exactly N+1th place at a tournament qualifying N teams, one loss behind the team in Nth place, and must lose one of their games by 90 or fewer points, and their opponent in that game must have gotten a current events tossup right, otherwise the scenario doesn't make sense. Also, this team must not qualify by any other tournnament, and thus not attend the HSNCT as a result. Is there any example of such a team actually existing?
Matt Weiner
Advisor to Quizbowl at Virginia Commonwealth University / Founder of hsquizbowl.org
User avatar
cvdwightw
Auron
Posts: 3291
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:46 am
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by cvdwightw »

Matt Weiner wrote:
bt_green_warbler wrote:Consider here the case of a marginal HSNCT team that is strong in fine arts: if the HSNCT were significantly shifted, they could justifiably claim that they would perform better at HSNCT than a team that qualified ahead of them by answering that extra current events tossup that would go by the wayside at the more difficult tounament.
I'll split this off to a new thread if you think it's too far afield a topic, but I disagree with this reasoning. It seems that, in reality, any team that consistently misses out on a qualification spot by a one-question swing in a single game will either qualify anyway at a different tournament*, or be accepted for a wild-card bid. Thus, I do not think the above hypothetical is a convincing argument against bifurcating the IS and HSNCT distributions.

*Since, under your scenario, this team must finish in exactly N+1th place at a tournament qualifying N teams, one loss behind the team in Nth place, and must lose one of their games by 90 or fewer points, and their opponent in that game must have gotten a current events tossup right, otherwise the scenario doesn't make sense. Also, this team must not qualify by any other tournnament, and thus not attend the HSNCT as a result. Is there any example of such a team actually existing?
Matt's hypothetical scenario is not the only condition when this would hold true (consider the case of three teams in a circle of death for less than three top bracket spots; a strong fine arts team would be disadvantaged compared to a strong current events team if the tiebreaker used was points per game, or less strongly, bonus conversion). In the case of a small circuit with few qualifying tournaments and many quality teams, these scenarios could plausibly (though improbably) exist.

While this would be fairly impossible to prove without mounds of data, I would conjecture that by and large, the playoff teams at HSNCT are converting IS current events/pop culture and IS fine arts/social science at a roughly similar rate (top playoff teams may even be converting fine arts at a higher rate), while the teams finishing 3-7 at HSNCT or not making it there in the first place are converting current events at a much higher proportion than fine arts. Since the vast majority of any given regular tournament field will be teams that either don't qualify for HSNCT or aren't in any sort of playoff contention, the conversion rate will likely be low overall. It's entirely possible that this conjecture is false and actually no teams are converting current events at an equal level to fine arts, but this appears to be one case where stratifying the data (HSNCT playoff teams vs HSNCT qualifiers vs non-qualifiers) makes sense.
Dwight Wynne
socalquizbowl.org
UC Irvine 2008-2013; UCLA 2004-2007; Capistrano Valley High School 2000-2003

"It's a competition, but it's not a sport. On a scale, if football is a 10, then rowing would be a two. One would be Quiz Bowl." --Matt Birk on rowing, SI On Campus, 10/21/03

"If you were my teammate, I would have tossed your ass out the door so fast you'd be emitting Cerenkov radiation, but I'm not classy like Dwight." --Jerry
Locked