NAQT distributions posted

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
Locked
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:53 pm

NAQT is pleased to announce that our distribution is now available on naqt.com.

High school distribution
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
at your pleasure
Auron
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:56 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by at your pleasure » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:14 pm

I personally think that lit and myth should be split to 4/4 lit and 1/1 myth, which garuantees a reasonable balance between lit and myth. Still, I'm glad to see NAQT make itself more transparent by doing stuff like this.
Douglas Graebner, Walt Whitman HS 10, Uchicago 14
"... imagination acts upon man as really as does gravitation, and may kill him as certainly as a dose of prussic acid."-Sir James Frazer,The Golden Bough

http://avorticistking.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Sen. Estes Kefauver (D-TN)
Chairman of Anti-Music Mafia Committee
Posts: 5640
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Sen. Estes Kefauver (D-TN) » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:32 pm

I appreciate this move towards openness in your new role with NAQT, and look forward to more. THank you Jeff.
Charlie Dees, North Kansas City HS '08
"I won't say more because I know some of you parse everything I say." - Jeremy Gibbs

"At one TJ tournament the neg prize was the Hampshire College ultimate frisbee team (nude) calender featuring one Evan Silberman. In retrospect that could have been a disaster." - Harry White

User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area » Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:32 pm

Anti-Climacus wrote:I personally think that lit and myth should be split to 4/4 lit and 1/1 myth, which garuantees a reasonable balance between lit and myth.
Do you mean balance between packets within a tournament set?

If so, we already do this:

For IS #76:

Round (Myth, Religious Literature, Non-myth Non-religious Literature)

1 (1/1, -, 4/3)
2 (1/1, -, 3/4)
3 (0/1, -, 5/3)
4 (1/0, -, 3/5)
5 (1/1, -, 4/3)
6 (0/1, -, 4/4)
7 (-, 1/0, 4/4)
8 (1/0, 0/1, 3/4)
9 (0/1, -, 5/3)
10 (1/0, 0/1, 3/4)
11 (-, 1/0, 4/4)
12 (-, 0/1, 4/4)
13 (0/1, 1/0, 4/3)
14 (-, 1/0, 3/5)
15 (-, 0/1, 4/4)

This looks slightly suboptimal to me, in that the religion tends toward the end of the tournament and the myth towards the beginning, and in that some rounds have 1/1 myth and some have nothing; but I don't believe it's wildly out of balance.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
TheCzarMan
Tidus
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Bloomfield, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by TheCzarMan » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:03 pm

I don't like the Science Dist., could go elsewhere to Fine Arts or Social Science.
Nick Petrilli
Bloomfield High School 2009
Freelance/Mercenary Moderator, TD, Player, and Reader

User avatar
Matt Weiner
Sin
Posts: 8411
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Matt Weiner » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:13 pm

Thanks for doing this.

I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
Matt Weiner
Founder of hsquizbowl.org

User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:32 pm

Matt Weiner wrote:Thanks for doing this.

I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
HSNCT uses the same weights as the posted distribution. I've asked R. to add this clarification.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
AlphaQuizBowler
Tidus
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: Alpharetta, GA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by AlphaQuizBowler » Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:14 pm

That's a bit too much science and, if myth is in with lit, not enough lit, in my opinion.
William
Alpharetta High School '11
Harvard '15

User avatar
Deviant Insider
Auron
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Chicagoland
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Deviant Insider » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:13 pm

Thank you very much for posting this and engaging in this discussion--there is a good discussion going on in the college section.

My biggest complaint about the distribution is the PC_Sport 1.7/1.7. Getting that down to 1/1 would be an improvement, and the extra questions could go into any category.
David Reinstein
PACE VP of Outreach, Head Writer and Editor for Scobol Solo and Masonics (Illinois), TD for New Trier Scobol Solo and New Trier Varsity, Writer for NAQT (2011-2017), IHSSBCA Board Member, IHSSBCA Chair (2004-2014), PACE Member, PACE President (2016-2018), New Trier Coach (1994-2011)

User avatar
Galstaff, Sorceror of Light
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Galstaff, Sorceror of Light » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:15 pm

Shcool wrote:Thank you very much for posting this and engaging in this discussion--there is a good discussion going on in the college section.

My biggest complaint about the distribution is the PC_Sport 1.7/1.7. Getting that down to 1/1 would be an improvement, and the extra questions could go into any category.
The extra questions could go into lit, which is grossly underrepresented compared to history and science given that religion and myth are shoved into that distribution currently.
Sam (Sarah Angelo) Luongo,
Maggie L. Walker Governor's School 2010 / UVA 2014 / VCU School of Education 2016
President, PACE
Member, ACF

User avatar
cvdwightw
Auron
Posts: 3446
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:46 am
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by cvdwightw » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:28 pm

Initially I thought the huge increase in the science weights was due to mathcalc, but it's not. I agree with reducing the science distribution to something like 78/68 (eliminating 4 mathcalc and 12/12 proportional to current weights). The resulting 16/12 could be funneled mostly into literature to give that equal standing with history, with the rest spread across other categories. I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
Dwight Wynne
socalquizbowl.org
UC Irvine 2008-2013; UCLA 2004-2007; Capistrano Valley High School 2000-2003

"It's a competition, but it's not a sport. On a scale, if football is a 10, then rowing would be a two. One would be Quiz Bowl." --Matt Birk on rowing, SI On Campus, 10/21/03

"If you were my teammate, I would have tossed your ass out the door so fast you'd be emitting Cerenkov radiation, but I'm not classy like Dwight." --Jerry

User avatar
Mechanical Beasts
Banned Cheater
Posts: 5673
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Mechanical Beasts » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:38 pm

cvdwightw wrote:I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
This. Moreover, I can even understand not giving world lit 1/1 per packet at this level, but I can't understand giving it 2/2 per tournament. Unless 4/4 of misc lit is shadow world lit, I think that can stand to be increased a bit.
Andrew Watkins

User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:53 pm

everyday847 wrote:
cvdwightw wrote:I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
This. Moreover, I can even understand not giving world lit 1/1 per packet at this level, but I can't understand giving it 2/2 per tournament. Unless 4/4 of misc lit is shadow world lit, I think that can stand to be increased a bit.
At least some of it is shadow world lit; but it is also a long-standing trend in our feedback that people are not, in fact, converting literature questions at the same rate as history and science. Continental European and non-Western literature have been particular problem areas (yes, this includes those A-series Stendhal tossups we were talking about a while back).
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15276
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by AKKOLADE » Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:09 pm

Thank you for posting the distribution on both the high school and the college levels, NAQT. I really appreciate this move towards openness.
Fred Morlan
PACE President, 2018-19
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, co-owner
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
hsqbrank manager, NAQT writer (former subject editor), former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator, 2012 NASAT TD

User avatar
Huang
Rikku
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:29 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Huang » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:58 pm

It's disappointing to see Computation/Geography/"Sports"/Current Events/General Knowledge comprise 7.9/7 of a NAQT packet. Out of these 5 categories, "sport"'s distribution of 1.7/1.7 undercuts the "A" in NAQT the most. Why can't geography be reduced to 1/1 and "sports"/current events/general knowledge form 1/1 of a packet? Or am I unaware of certain requirements NAQT must fulfill?
Sandy

User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area » Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:19 pm

bt_green_warbler wrote:
Matt Weiner wrote:I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
HSNCT uses the same weights as the posted distribution. I've asked R. to add this clarification.
R. informs me that while the weights for HSNCT are in fact very similar to the IS distribution, the HSNCT distribution shares certain features with our college distribution (notably the split of philosophy questions to ensure balance among eras).

Therefore we've posted a third page with the complete HSNCT distribution.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
The Laughing Man
Lulu
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 4:57 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by The Laughing Man » Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:38 pm

everyday847 wrote:
cvdwightw wrote:I understand the rationale for having relatively low numbers of philosophy, social science, and even perhaps arts (low conversion rates), but I don't understand why academic literature has less than 4/4 a packet. Are people really not converting literature questions?
This. Moreover, I can even understand not giving world lit 1/1 per packet at this level, but I can't understand giving it 2/2 per tournament. Unless 4/4 of misc lit is shadow world lit, I think that can stand to be increased a bit.
Especially at HSNCT, the field is strong enough that there is convertable world lit that there should be at the very least .5/.5 world lit per round. Really, I think at HSNCT American, English, Continental and World could be roughly equal without hurting conversion too much.
Ben, State College '09
Swarthmore '13

User avatar
First Chairman
Auron
Posts: 3875
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 8:21 pm
Location: Fairfax VA
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by First Chairman » Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:04 pm

bt_green_warbler wrote:NAQT is pleased to announce that our distribution is now available on naqt.com.

High school distribution
If it hasn't been said enough (and it should be said more), thank you.
Emil Thomas Chuck, Ph.D.
Founder, PACE
Facebook junkie and unofficial advisor to aspiring health professionals in quiz bowl
---
Pimping Green Tea Ginger Ale (Canada Dry)

User avatar
Matt Weiner
Sin
Posts: 8411
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Matt Weiner » Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:14 pm

The Laughing Man wrote: Really, I think at HSNCT American, English, Continental and World could be roughly equal without hurting conversion too much.
That's more than even collegiate distributions do--world lit is 1/1 in ACF and ACF-like distros, but that's out of 5/5 including the extra 1/1 lit for tiebreakers. I'm not sure I would want to write 18/18 world lit for HSNCT or NSC; I think there are some problems with conversion when you get to that much. With that said, yeah, only 2/2 per tournament is far too little.
Matt Weiner
Founder of hsquizbowl.org

User avatar
Mechanical Beasts
Banned Cheater
Posts: 5673
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Mechanical Beasts » Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:19 pm

Matt Weiner wrote:
The Laughing Man wrote: Really, I think at HSNCT American, English, Continental and World could be roughly equal without hurting conversion too much.
That's more than even collegiate distributions do--world lit is 1/1 in ACF and ACF-like distros, but that's out of 5/5 including the extra 1/1 lit for tiebreakers. I'm not sure I would want to write 18/18 world lit for HSNCT or NSC; I think there are some problems with conversion when you get to that much. With that said, yeah, only 2/2 per tournament is far too little.
You forget that State College gets fed up when 62: A Model Kit appears in the leadin to that oh-so-easy Cortazar tossup. (I mean, hasn't every high school team read Around the Day in Eighty Worlds?)

Snark aside: yeah, I agree. Having planned out world lit for HFT with Kyle, 10/10 was around the boundary of what felt comfortable, and even then it felt like there were too many common-link-on-a-country questions.
Andrew Watkins

User avatar
Galstaff, Sorceror of Light
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Galstaff, Sorceror of Light » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:34 pm

bt_green_warbler wrote:
bt_green_warbler wrote:
Matt Weiner wrote:I noticed that the high school distribution says it's for IS and IS-A sets; is there a reason HSNCT is not mentioned on that page?
HSNCT uses the same weights as the posted distribution. I've asked R. to add this clarification.
R. informs me that while the weights for HSNCT are in fact very similar to the IS distribution, the HSNCT distribution shares certain features with our college distribution (notably the split of philosophy questions to ensure balance among eras).

Therefore we've posted a third page with the complete HSNCT distribution.
Glad to finally be able to see these, but why on earth is there more current events than fine arts, especially at HSNCT?
Sam (Sarah Angelo) Luongo,
Maggie L. Walker Governor's School 2010 / UVA 2014 / VCU School of Education 2016
President, PACE
Member, ACF

User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Important Bird Area » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:17 pm

MLWGS-Gir wrote:why on earth is there more current events than fine arts, especially at HSNCT?
Some of the contributing factors here:

1. NAQT believes that our IS distribution and HSNCT distribution should be broadly similar, to ensure the fairness of qualification. (Consider here the case of a marginal HSNCT team that is strong in fine arts: if the HSNCT were significantly shifted, they could justifiably claim that they would perform better at HSNCT than a team that qualified ahead of them by answering that extra current events tossup.)

2. Fine arts, like philosophy and social science, sees consistently weak conversion numbers at lower levels of difficulty.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
Matt Weiner
Sin
Posts: 8411
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by Matt Weiner » Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:22 pm

bt_green_warbler wrote:Consider here the case of a marginal HSNCT team that is strong in fine arts: if the HSNCT were significantly shifted, they could justifiably claim that they would perform better at HSNCT than a team that qualified ahead of them by answering that extra current events tossup that would go by the wayside at the more difficult tounament.
I'll split this off to a new thread if you think it's too far afield a topic, but I disagree with this reasoning. It seems that, in reality, any team that consistently misses out on a qualification spot by a one-question swing in a single game will either qualify anyway at a different tournament*, or be accepted for a wild-card bid. Thus, I do not think the above hypothetical is a convincing argument against bifurcating the IS and HSNCT distributions.

*Since, under your scenario, this team must finish in exactly N+1th place at a tournament qualifying N teams, one loss behind the team in Nth place, and must lose one of their games by 90 or fewer points, and their opponent in that game must have gotten a current events tossup right, otherwise the scenario doesn't make sense. Also, this team must not qualify by any other tournnament, and thus not attend the HSNCT as a result. Is there any example of such a team actually existing?
Matt Weiner
Founder of hsquizbowl.org

User avatar
cvdwightw
Auron
Posts: 3446
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:46 am
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Re: NAQT distributions posted

Post by cvdwightw » Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:18 pm

Matt Weiner wrote:
bt_green_warbler wrote:Consider here the case of a marginal HSNCT team that is strong in fine arts: if the HSNCT were significantly shifted, they could justifiably claim that they would perform better at HSNCT than a team that qualified ahead of them by answering that extra current events tossup that would go by the wayside at the more difficult tounament.
I'll split this off to a new thread if you think it's too far afield a topic, but I disagree with this reasoning. It seems that, in reality, any team that consistently misses out on a qualification spot by a one-question swing in a single game will either qualify anyway at a different tournament*, or be accepted for a wild-card bid. Thus, I do not think the above hypothetical is a convincing argument against bifurcating the IS and HSNCT distributions.

*Since, under your scenario, this team must finish in exactly N+1th place at a tournament qualifying N teams, one loss behind the team in Nth place, and must lose one of their games by 90 or fewer points, and their opponent in that game must have gotten a current events tossup right, otherwise the scenario doesn't make sense. Also, this team must not qualify by any other tournnament, and thus not attend the HSNCT as a result. Is there any example of such a team actually existing?
Matt's hypothetical scenario is not the only condition when this would hold true (consider the case of three teams in a circle of death for less than three top bracket spots; a strong fine arts team would be disadvantaged compared to a strong current events team if the tiebreaker used was points per game, or less strongly, bonus conversion). In the case of a small circuit with few qualifying tournaments and many quality teams, these scenarios could plausibly (though improbably) exist.

While this would be fairly impossible to prove without mounds of data, I would conjecture that by and large, the playoff teams at HSNCT are converting IS current events/pop culture and IS fine arts/social science at a roughly similar rate (top playoff teams may even be converting fine arts at a higher rate), while the teams finishing 3-7 at HSNCT or not making it there in the first place are converting current events at a much higher proportion than fine arts. Since the vast majority of any given regular tournament field will be teams that either don't qualify for HSNCT or aren't in any sort of playoff contention, the conversion rate will likely be low overall. It's entirely possible that this conjecture is false and actually no teams are converting current events at an equal level to fine arts, but this appears to be one case where stratifying the data (HSNCT playoff teams vs HSNCT qualifiers vs non-qualifiers) makes sense.
Dwight Wynne
socalquizbowl.org
UC Irvine 2008-2013; UCLA 2004-2007; Capistrano Valley High School 2000-2003

"It's a competition, but it's not a sport. On a scale, if football is a 10, then rowing would be a two. One would be Quiz Bowl." --Matt Birk on rowing, SI On Campus, 10/21/03

"If you were my teammate, I would have tossed your ass out the door so fast you'd be emitting Cerenkov radiation, but I'm not classy like Dwight." --Jerry

Locked