Page 1 of 1

RMP (or just M) singles?

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by setht
Are people interested in the possibility of a singles tournament on religion/myth/philosophy, or just myth? I'd be willing to write a myth singles tournament, or the myth portion of an rmp tournament, if someone else wants to handle the religion and philosophy. I'd be even more willing to play such a tournament, if anyone else is interested in writing one.

-Seth

p.s.--if you have any thoughts on when such a tournament should be held, or on the proper breakdown between Greek myth/all other myth, feel free to weigh in.

p.p.s.--if you're interested in playing a religion and/or philosophy tournament, but not myth, I guess you can talk about that, if you want. Pervert.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:50 pm
by Rothlover
Call me a pervert if you wish, but I'd most be interested in just a Religion/Philo tournament, though this is most certainly colored by my knowledge of approximately 0 myth. I'd certainly still play a RMP tournament, however. The last two subject-specific tournaments have been excellent and I have no doubt that this would continue the trend.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:29 pm
by Romero
How about for the next Chicago Open?

I would be willing to write at least the Religion portion of such a tournament.

Chris

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:38 pm
by Susan
I'd be willing to help write religion or mythology, but much more willing to play.

Susan

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:36 pm
by solonqb
If the history singles are ever a possibility, I'd be happy to render whatever assistance I could via writing questions if I was unable to play.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:48 pm
by DanTheClam
I'd be delighted to play in an RMP singles tournament or to write some philosophy for it. An entire RMP tournament's worth would probably be too much, but I could probably write half a tournament's worth of good philosophy questions.

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:22 pm
by Scipio
I'd definitely play in a myth tournament, or an RMP tournament; and if Seth/Susan did the first one, I'd cheerfully write the second one.

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:52 am
by No Rules Westbrook
I too would potentially be willing to write a myth singles tournament, and I think it would be worthwhile, if a majority of people were in favor of a singles that narrow in focus. I'd likely be somewhat less apt at religion and philosophy writing, especially the latter.



Let it be noted that I restrained myself from advocating a geography singles in that poll, despite the fact that I'd laugh my ass off and probably love playing it.

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:12 am
by Matt Weiner
I'd probably play anything except geography or science, although I think social science would also be ill-advised. There just aren't anywhere near 400 tossupable social science topics.

I'm equally intrigued by either the history or RMP events. Perhaps instead of deciding between M and RMP we could just do RM? There's enough crossover there anyway that usually the same person knows both on a team, and there's plenty of easy giveaways regardless, but philosophy attracts a different set of players.