Page 2 of 2

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:42 pm
by Eddie
vinteuil wrote:The question on Chinese music described a notation style (numbers for scale degrees, dots for octaves below and above) that is extremely common in notating non-western musics (Indian, Indonesian, and Japanese music all use it, at least).

The question on "3" began with a clue that is at best ambiguous, since the German augmented 6th chord is often spelled with #2 instead of b3 (and b3 is not really the same as scale degree 3, in major mode).
Thanks for the corrections; the China tossup has been fixed accordingly.

For the theory tossup, do you think a lead-in like this would be an improvement?

"The flattened scale degree of this number can be added to an Italian sixth chord to produce a German sixth chord."

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 6:51 pm
by vinteuil
Spheal With It wrote:
vinteuil wrote:The question on Chinese music described a notation style (numbers for scale degrees, dots for octaves below and above) that is extremely common in notating non-western musics (Indian, Indonesian, and Japanese music all use it, at least).

The question on "3" began with a clue that is at best ambiguous, since the German augmented 6th chord is often spelled with #2 instead of b3 (and b3 is not really the same as scale degree 3, in major mode).
Thanks for the corrections; the China tossup has been fixed accordingly.

For the theory tossup, do you think a lead-in like this would be an improvement?

"The flattened scale degree of this number can be added to an Italian sixth chord to produce a German sixth chord."
Sure, that removes the ambiguity ("can" is good). Thanks!

Again, as I said in the other thread, I thought the music was the most solidly consistent category in the tournament, so kudos.

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:41 pm
by Oh No You Didn't
Hey, so if I remember correctly the leadin to the kamakura tu wasn't super ideal because it referenced one of go-toba's actions which occurred during the kamakura period but led to at least 1 neg w/ the Heian period

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:55 pm
by Sima Guang Hater
Black Miao wrote:Hey, so if I remember correctly the leadin to the kamakura tu wasn't super ideal because it referenced one of go-toba's actions which occurred during the kamakura period but led to at least 1 neg w/ the Heian period
You're right; Go-Toba's reign was in the Heian, but that poetry collection was released in the Kamakura. That's worth fixing, good catch.

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 12:28 am
by Masked Canadian History Bandit
Muriel Axon wrote: In Word, the red squiggle for unrecognized words can make v's and y's hard to distinguish.
There is an option in Word (and Pages) to turn off tracking for spelling/grammar errors, which greatly improves readability.

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:23 am
by kdroge
Could someone with access to the set post the bonus about pornography? I'm having trouble downloading the set on my phone- thanks!

Re: Specific Question Discussion (Penn Bowl 2015)

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:08 am
by Lighthouse Expert Elinor DeWire
The tossup on metamorphic rock refers to it as "this specific material" at one point, which made it seem it was looking for a specific type of metamorphic rock for the first two thirds or so of the tossup.