Average Score of Top Individual Players

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
Locked
User avatar
Ted
Lulu
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:28 pm

Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Ted »

What is the average score a top player? (Maybe top 10 in a tournament) I know that there are variations between the different question sets, but I am a Quizbowl Padawan and know nothing about them.
Ted Barrett
Moorestown Friends '12

"I'm a big believer in luck, and I find that the harder I work, the more I have of it"
User avatar
Nine-Tenths Ideas
Auron
Posts: 1554
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: MD

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Nine-Tenths Ideas »

Well, it depends on the player. I've seen highest individual scores at tournaments range from anywhere in the high 80s to 120s[!].
Isaac Hirsch
University of Maryland '14
Never Gonna Play Again
User avatar
Mechanical Beasts
Banned Cheater
Posts: 5673
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Mechanical Beasts »

It also depends on the region, because that determines the field. Some Pittsburgh tournaments when I was in high school had a high scorer between 40-50 ppg (when Pittsburgh was weak); I broke 100ppg that one tournament senior year, and Charlie did the same. It's rather too variable to make generalizations.
Andrew Watkins
User avatar
dtaylor4
Auron
Posts: 3733
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:43 am

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by dtaylor4 »

Crazy Andy Watkins wrote:It also depends on the region, because that determines the field. Some Pittsburgh tournaments when I was in high school had a high scorer between 40-50 ppg (when Pittsburgh was weak); I broke 100ppg that one tournament senior year, and Charlie did the same. It's rather too variable to make generalizations.
Also, some strong teams have 2-4 players who can each put up a decent PPG, but crowd each other out.

Also, powers can also skew the average PPG upwards.
User avatar
theMoMA
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5796
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:00 am

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by theMoMA »

I've noticed that the top eight to ten players typically put up 40+ PPG at tournaments with around a dozen teams. PPG isn't always the best indicator of the being a good player though. As Donald mentioned, the better teams often have players who could score many more PPG if they played separately, but crowd each other out of more points. Oftentimes, the top PPG players are the ones with the most chances to score because of teammates.
Andrew Hart
Minnesota alum
Angry Babies in Love
Yuna
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: MD//DC

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Angry Babies in Love »

theMoMA wrote:I've noticed that the top eight to ten players typically put up 40+ PPG at tournaments with around a dozen teams. PPG isn't always the best indicator of the being a good player though. As Donald mentioned, the better teams often have players who could score many more PPG if they played separately, but crowd each other out of more points. Oftentimes, the top PPG players are the ones with the most chances to score because of teammates.
Players who play alone (either figuratively or literally) can put up some pretty high numbers. Usually Matt Jackson, for example puts up in the neighborhood of 100, sometimes more depending on the field. But you can't judge a player on PPG unless they're playing alone.
Raynell Cooper
Arcadia ES '04
Richard Montgomery HS '11
George Washington University '15
University of Maryland, College Park '17
Hella things, National History Bee and Bowl
User avatar
Ted
Lulu
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:28 pm

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Ted »

That's a really good point that it is determined by teammates. I didn't really take that into account. I'm from New Jersey, so we have quite a few great teams and players around here. (State College, Charter, St. Joes, etc.)
Ted Barrett
Moorestown Friends '12

"I'm a big believer in luck, and I find that the harder I work, the more I have of it"
User avatar
Rufous-capped Thornbill
Tidus
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Rufous-capped Thornbill »

PPG is a pretty meaningless stat if you want to compare the top players. For example, I'd put Dorman's or State College's players against almost anyone in the country, as they are extremely good specialists, but they rarely score more than 50ppg. Occasionally, you have one player who is good enough to score a lot of points despite playing on a great team(see: Henry Gorman last year).

However, you will usually find that the top scorers are playing by themselves, either figuratively or literally.
Jarret Greene
South Range '10 / Ohio State '13 / Vermont '17
User avatar
Frater Taciturnus
Auron
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:26 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Frater Taciturnus »

Inkana7 wrote:PPG is a pretty meaningless stat if you want to compare the top players. For example, I'd put Dorman's or State College's players against almost anyone in the country, as they are extremely good specialists, but they rarely score more than 50ppg. Occasionally, you have one player who is good enough to score a lot of points despite playing on a great team(see: Henry Gorman last year).

However, you will usually find that the top scorers are playing by themselves, either figuratively or literally.
This is where PATH becomes useful as it adjusts the TUH to be "TUH that your teammates didn't buzz on"
George Berry
[email protected]
they/them/their(s)
--------------
J. Sargeant Reynolds CC 2008, 2009, 2014
Virginia Commonwealth 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013,
Douglas Freeman 2005, 2006, 2007
User avatar
Joe Romersa
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:20 am
Contact:

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Joe Romersa »

Whats PATH?

Also, as an example, in Southern California, there are teams with one person carrying them, like
Rancho Bernardo: http://naqt.com/stats/team-performance. ... m_id=19246
Torrey Pines: http://naqt.com/stats/team-performance. ... m_id=19258

and more balanced teams like
Santa Monica: http://naqt.com/stats/team-performance. ... m_id=19259
La Jolla: http://naqt.com/stats/team-performance. ... m_id=19247
Us (Arcadia): http://naqt.com/stats/team-performance. ... m_id=19252
Alex Wang
Arcadia High '10
UCLA '14 or so
User avatar
Frater Taciturnus
Auron
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:26 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Frater Taciturnus »

al3xWal3x wrote:Whats PATH?
basically its [(Points)/(Adjusted Tossups Heard*)] X 20.

*Adjusted TU Heard is found by subtracting the totals of tossups gotten and negs made by all the player's teammates from the player's tossups heard. This of course means that subs totally screw this equation up.

For example I will use VCU at EFT this year. All players start with 200 TUH, per the 10 game schedule.

Evan
Points: 86-14 (790)
"TU Consumed": 100
Adj TUH: 200-28-16-3= 153

PATH= 103.27

George
Points: 24-4 (220)
"TU Consumed": 28
Adj TUH: 200-100-16-3=81

PATH= 54.32

Sean
Points: 13-3 (115)
"TU Consumed": 16
Adj TUH: 200-100-28-3= 69

PATH= 33.33

Cody
Points: 3-0 (30)
"TU Consumed": 3
Adj TUH:200-100-28-16= 56

PATH=10.71


PATH essentially measures how good a player is on the team that player plays with, and levels out the disparities shadowing tends to create.
George Berry
[email protected]
they/them/their(s)
--------------
J. Sargeant Reynolds CC 2008, 2009, 2014
Virginia Commonwealth 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013,
Douglas Freeman 2005, 2006, 2007
User avatar
Joe Romersa
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:20 am
Contact:

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Joe Romersa »

Doesn't this just give people with higher PPGs even higher PATHs and lower PPGs slightly higher PATHs?
Alex Wang
Arcadia High '10
UCLA '14 or so
User avatar
Whiter Hydra
Auron
Posts: 1317
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:46 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA
Contact:

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Whiter Hydra »

al3xWal3x wrote:Doesn't this just give people with higher PPGs even higher PATHs and lower PPGs slightly higher PATHs?
Well, look at how much it increased:

Code: Select all

Player  PPG   PATH Change
Evan   79.0 103.27  30.7%
George 22.0  54.32 146.9%
Sean   11.5  33.33 189.8%
Cody    3.0  10.71 257.0%
Harry White
TJHSST '09, Virginia Tech '13
VP of Technology, PACE
Owner of Tournament Database Search and Quizbowl Schedule Generator
Will run stats for food
User avatar
Joe Romersa
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:20 am
Contact:

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by Joe Romersa »

OH I calculated it wrong when I did it.

Now it makes more sense...
Alex Wang
Arcadia High '10
UCLA '14 or so
User avatar
jdeliverer
Rikku
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Providence

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by jdeliverer »

PATH still systematically favors specialists playing on good teams. If you pick up most tossups in a category and your team buzzes on everything else, you'll have ridiculously high PATH. It depends on what you're trying to measure, but it still doesn't indicate individual skill as a whole. A very good generalist on a team full of buzzer rocks won't have a chance against a specialist on a good team.
Robert Volgman
Brown '14
Latin School of Chicago '10
User avatar
pblessman
Tidus
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 10:38 am
Location: Culver, Indiana

Re: Average Score of Top Individual Players

Post by pblessman »

A while back I thought about how to adjust a ppg to account for teammates' (and opponents') quality. I came up with this adjusted stat for the adjusted/effective points a player scores in a game:

Own Points+1/4 of Teammates Points+1/8 of Opponents' points=Adjusted points. The caps on the second and third parts of this equation would be the number of points the player scored, so s/he could never get an adjusted points total of more than three times the actual point total. Don't know if this makes much sense, but it somehow feels right...

I had the same idea for adjusting team ppg: Adjusted points=Own Points+1/2 opponents points, capped at twice your own score. That would mean that winning 600-0 is just as good as tying 400-400 or losing 300-600 (in terms of appg). That "looks" right to me... kind of...
Phil Blessman- Culver Academies Head Quizbowl Coach
Locked