HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15616
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Re: HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Post by AKKOLADE »

So the current aPPB adjustment for HFT is +1.56; this is to say, the average PPB for teams that played HFT is 1.56 points lower than that same team's PPB on a IS level NAQT set. For comparison, last year's HFT was +2.43; last year's BHSAT was +1.03; this year's ACF Fall is currently at +2.22; this year's Maryland Spring is currently at +2.21.

This year's number will change as more teams get IS stat lines and/or play HFT. Bonus conversion data isn't the only thing that should be looked at; I'd like to one day start evaluating what percentage of tossups are answered correctly by teams, but I've yet to have the time to do that.
Fred Morlan
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, co-owner
PACE
former (?) hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
User avatar
Mark Wolfsberg
Lulu
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:20 am
Location: Bethlehem , NY

Re: HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Post by Mark Wolfsberg »

Dr. Loki Skylizard, Thoracic Surgeon wrote:So the current aPPB adjustment for HFT is +1.56; this is to say, the average PPB for teams that played HFT is 1.56 points lower than that same team's PPB on a IS level NAQT set. For comparison, last year's HFT was +2.43; last year's BHSAT was +1.03; this year's ACF Fall is currently at +2.22; this year's Maryland Spring is currently at +2.21.

This year's number will change as more teams get IS stat lines and/or play HFT. Bonus conversion data isn't the only thing that should be looked at; I'd like to one day start evaluating what percentage of tossups are answered correctly by teams, but I've yet to have the time to do that.
Thanks for doing this. Is it safe to say that, at least on bonuses, Harvard QB made the questions easier than last year?
Mark Wolfsberg
Parent / Driver - certainly not a coach
Bethlehem History Bowl Club
User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15616
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Re: HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Post by AKKOLADE »

Too early to say definitively.
Fred Morlan
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, co-owner
PACE
former (?) hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
Lo, Marathon Ham!
Wakka
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Post by Lo, Marathon Ham! »

We actually felt the bonuses were a lot harder, especially given that our current A team, which is our B team from last year with our fourth scorer replaced by our captain Varun (who is also top scorer), scored only a slightly higher ppb than last year's B team despite having greatly improved.
Mohan Malhotra
The Independence School '12
Charter School of Wilmington '16
New York University '20
Wilmington, DE/New York City, NY
User avatar
gimmedatguudsuccrose
Wakka
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:17 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Post by gimmedatguudsuccrose »

With regards to HFT's bonuses, I feel that almost every one was a sure ten, but to get 30 (on average) required deeper knowledge than previous HFT sets. However, bonus difficulty varied WILDLY among packets and subjects, so the current aPPB is great, but might not be the most accurate.
χ Smith
FHS '15
Chicago '19
Reesefulgenzi
Lulu
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:44 pm

Re: HFT IX @ Harvard (11/15/14)

Post by Reesefulgenzi »

Despite the logistical hiccups, Loudoun County enjoyed the set and the tournament.
For the stats, on round 6 (Loudoun County v Lexington), we had 16.67ppb, not 5.56ppb, with a score of 245-295.

Reese
Reese Fulgenzi
Loudoun County High School, 2015
University of Virginia, 2019
University of Chicago, 202x
Locked