Sandbagging

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
Locked
User avatar
rchschem
Yuna
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:36 am
Location: Durham, NC

Sandbagging

Post by rchschem »

How many TAs actively punish sandbagging? The only time I have ever heard this actively threatened is at Brookwood. I am aware of some teams who currently practice this and was just wondering what the general population felt, or how this is handled in different parts of the country.

Eric
Raleigh Charter
User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15588
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Re: Sandbagging

Post by AKKOLADE »

What are you referring to as sandbagging?
Fred Morlan
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, co-owner
PACE
former (?) hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
User avatar
Dan Greenstein
Auron
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 8:26 pm
Location: Takoma Park, MD

Post by Dan Greenstein »

What is a TA?
User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15588
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Post by AKKOLADE »

Dan Greenstein wrote:What is a TA?
My assumption is team advisor.
Fred Morlan
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, co-owner
PACE
former (?) hsqbrank manager, former NAQT writer & subject editor, former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator
User avatar
rchschem
Yuna
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:36 am
Location: Durham, NC

Post by rchschem »

TA (tournament administrator), although team advisor would work. Sandbagging is when you intentionally put your better players on your B team so that they have a better chance of making the tournament in those formats where TAs (ibid) try to match A's against A's and B's against B's for fairness' sake.
User avatar
Howard
Yuna
Posts: 967
Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 5:42 pm
Location: Ellicott City, MD

Post by Howard »

I've never seen this happen when it was made clear that it was not allowed. I figure let all the teams move players around however they want and let them all try to guess what the others are doing.

In swiss systems it really doesn't matter anyway. Of course, if the tournament is bracketed or has varsity and jv divisions, then it could be an issue and it's quite reasonable to ban it.
User avatar
solonqb
Tidus
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Post by solonqb »

I've never seen it addressed by TDs in the Midwest, but most schools here woudn't play dirty like that anyway with the exception of a certain Michigan private school that shall remain unnamed (only last year, though)...
Noah Rahman
Welcome to Simbabwe, where the property is already owned and the houses built and you compete to burn and dispossess them. Compete with Robert Mugabe, Canaan Banana, Cecil Rhodes and Sir Godfrey Huggins to earn a place on the all-time EU travel ban list!
NotBhan
Rikku
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 12:30 pm
Location: Parts Unknown

Post by NotBhan »

I don't think there's anything wrong with this practice unless the TD (or TA, if you prefer) specifically asks that the A team be the team that the school expects to be the strongest.

I presume you're talking about a situation in which all players are properly eligible, but the top players are put on the B team for some strategic purpose (like if the B team would have an easier road to the playoff round because of the nature of their bracket). "Backloading" is the term I've heard for this. Unless it violates a clear request of the TD, backloading is a fair strategic ploy. It sucks if you're the TD and you've carefully set up balanced brackets, only to have them tilted by one school's backloading, but that's only an 'unfair' ploy if the TD has failed to request in advance that the A team be the true A team.
User avatar
cvdwightw
Auron
Posts: 3446
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:46 am
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Post by cvdwightw »

Howard wrote: Of course, if the tournament is bracketed or has varsity and jv divisions, then it could be an issue and it's quite reasonable to ban it.
Bracketed round robin tournaments, if run correctly, should not have an issue with this so-called sandbagging. Most of the tournaments I have attended or helped run that are of this style attempt to place teams in roughly equal brackets, but because we don't know exactly who is going to show up (both literally and figuratively) for any given team, getting them equal is impossible. One bracket may be slightly more stacked than the other(s), but if rebracketing is done correctly, the teams should come out in roughly the order they should have.

With varsity/JV divisions this could be more of an issue. If a player qualifies for JV under the tournament rules, then he/she should be eligible to play. While that certain private school may have violated the spirit of the JV division, it did not violate the rules of the JV division (as far as I know; Noah, correct me if I'm wrong). It would be entirely unfair to single out players because they're "too good for JV" without some kind of impartial arbiter (i.e. a ppg average or scoring more than x ppg for a team that finished in the top n at a tournament) The inherent problem here would be sending a worse A team to the varsity division. This is unfair especially to the four players on the A team who should have been in JV, but also because it ends up "corrupting" not only JV but also varsity division, which has no fuzzy eligibility rules.

In summary: teams that qualify for JV should have the option to play JV, no matter how good they are. Some would argue that this violates the spirit of JV, and corrupts one division; they are completely entitled to this position. However, if a school is bringing more than one team, they should not place the better one in JV and the worse one in varsity, as this corrupts both divisions and therefore the spirit of quizbowl in general.
Admiral
Lulu
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 4:59 pm
Location: Land of Lincoln (but not Nebraska)

Post by Admiral »

At most Illinois tournaments, it is strictly frowned on. That doesn't stop the occasional coach from trying it.
"The first rule of quiz bowl is that you do not talk about quiz bowl.....Second Rule...last names only!"
UFeng
Lulu
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 1:34 pm
Location: Gainesville, FL
Contact:

Post by UFeng »

One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that while you may have given your best players (now on the B team) an easy road to the playoffs, you've also offered up your second team (now A) to the slaughter in the tougher division.

While I don't think there's a problem with a school doing this for a tournament, I also wouldn't see anything wrong if before starting, the tournament director sees this and flips the team's positions.
quizbowlmike
Wakka
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 2:16 pm
Location: Gainesville, FL
Contact:

Post by quizbowlmike »

How about when the A team switches with the B team because they think the B team got a better draw in the tournament seedings?

You may scoff, but it happened by a certain "D" team from SC 4 or 5 years ago.
Tegan
Coach of AHAN Jr.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:42 pm

Post by Tegan »

As a coach, I would have a hard time going to my players and saying "Star, Star, Star, Star, and Star" are playing the "B" schedule because it is easier, and the rest of you are going to sent to the slaughter. This used to be a big problem in Illinois, but it has become a pretty frowned upon habit.

Rather than 'jack this thread, I'm going to start another one on when this might be permissible....such as when the Host appears to be screwing with your team, and putting them in the shark tank when it isn't deserved.
acmatchbox20
Kimahri
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:49 pm

Post by acmatchbox20 »

Exactly how does one prove "sandbagging"? Ask the coach for rosters? Some coaches want their team to be as student-run as possible, including letting their captains choose lineups. There are schools out there, and successful ones I might add, that: 1. do not hold tryouts 2. do not make cuts 3. do not have "JV" and "varsity" teams 4. do not "study" nor divide up areas of knowledge and 5. take to a tournament whoever happens to be available that Saturday. This type of team is there because they love it,there to have fun, and yes, there to laugh at the teams who take the whole thing way too seriously. (Especially when they beat them, which happens more frequently than you might think.)
/shrugs. The best team, A or B or whatever, will prevail in the end. More productive to worry about your own players rather than what someone else is doing.
jewtemplar
Rikku
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 10:18 am
Location: Burke, VA
Contact:

Post by jewtemplar »

acmatchbox20 wrote:Exactly how does one prove "sandbagging"? Ask the coach for rosters? Some coaches want their team to be as student-run as possible, including letting their captains choose lineups. There are schools out there, and successful ones I might add, that: 1. do not hold tryouts 2. do not make cuts 3. do not have "JV" and "varsity" teams 4. do not "study" nor divide up areas of knowledge and 5. take to a tournament whoever happens to be available that Saturday. This type of team is there because they love it,there to have fun, and yes, there to laugh at the teams who take the whole thing way too seriously. (Especially when they beat them, which happens more frequently than you might think.)
/shrugs. The best team, A or B or whatever, will prevail in the end. More productive to worry about your own players rather than what someone else is doing.
For the most part, TJ is one of those.
User avatar
No Sollositing On Premise
Yuna
Posts: 901
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Contact:

Post by No Sollositing On Premise »

What do you mean "for the most part?" TJ is exactly that, except we practiced way more that our attitude would indicate.
Mike Sollosi, University of Virginia
STPickrell
Auron
Posts: 1501
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 11:12 pm
Location: Vienna, VA
Contact:

Post by STPickrell »

laszlow wrote:What do you mean "for the most part?" TJ is exactly that, except we practiced way more that our attitude would indicate.
I never saw the point of cuts. Why not let the weekend warriors have fun and have the serious players have fun too? As for being there, I only got annoyed if someone cut and ran at the last second b/c of poor planning. (By last minute I mean the Thursday-Friday before the tournament.)
Shawn Pickrell, HSAPQ CFO
User avatar
rchschem
Yuna
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:36 am
Location: Durham, NC

Post by rchschem »

If you see a team play at enough matches and get to know them a bit, you get to know who their aces are. When one week they show up as the A team and one week as B, it's obvious.

How would a tournament official know? Probably the same way, although it would admittedly be less likely that he or she would notice.

In its most egregious form, I have seen where teams have swapped players or complete teams amongst their A and B designations (whichever team makes the tournament, their A players end up on it regardless of what team they played on earlier). That's probably easy to catch.

As far as sending A to the slaughter, getting one team to the tourney rounds is better than none, but it would seem to me like a hell of a lot of work to scout all those teams in order to know how to rearrange the crews. Just play the darned matches.

I don't think this is a big problem; I've not seen it much. I was just wondering how others dealt with it when it did crop up.
NoahMinkCHS
Yuna
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:46 pm
Location: Athens, GA / Macon, GA
Contact:

Post by NoahMinkCHS »

The only time a tournament official would really "know" would be if there's a huge difference between the two teams. A couple years ago, we played a B team in the prelims at a big tournament (that had rules against it) and got beat... only to see in the standings later on that Team B had a better record and was scoring about 100 ppg more than Team A. In something like that, it's pretty cut and dried. But if the two teams are roughly equal, you can't tell, and it probably doesn't matter anyway; people have their good and bad days, after all.

I do think tournaments should have rules against this practice ("stacking" was the term I heard), at least if they have "balanced" bracketing. If not, or if there's no rule, I don't have as much of a problem with a team doing it. If there's no rule, then A and B are just arbitrary designations, and any assumption that A is better seems (to me, anyway) to be just an assumption.
samer
Wakka
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by samer »

UFeng wrote:One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that while you may have given your best players (now on the B team) an easy road to the playoffs, you've also offered up your second team (now A) to the slaughter in the tougher division.
Actually, I think in bracketed tournaments, a school doing this is just as liable to screw *both* teams over; I know of one school in CT that (allegedly) would routinely play their A team as their B team and vice versa at BHSAT.

Not knowing this, though, when I did the bracketing, I therefore ended up assigning the stronger (i.e., actual A, labeled B) team to a harder bracket than they would have otherwised played, while the weaker team might not be able to take advantage of the "gift" they received, given how strong many of the teams coming to Yale tend to be.
samer dot ismail -at- gmail dot com / Samer Ismail, PACE co-founder, NAQT editor
Tegan
Coach of AHAN Jr.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:42 pm

Post by Tegan »

I'm not sure how it is in other parts of the country, but in Illinois, we routinely do not submit rosters in advance. Once the pairings are posted, the coach can decide what they are going to do with assigning players. It really is not much of an issue in Illinois any more, but when coaches get found out doing this without a darn good explanation, they can find themselves in a world of hurt when they see their "A" team playing the state champs year in and year out, and their "B" team playing equally tough competition.

I think that's a great way to prevent it.
User avatar
First Chairman
Auron
Posts: 3875
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 8:21 pm
Location: Fairfax VA
Contact:

Post by First Chairman »

Just to provide assurance and confidence in the procedure, tournament directors should make it clear in advance that an "A" team means the better of two (or best of more) teams from that school. That's an implicit trust that the TD has with the coaches. There's not much one can do about it... even submitting rosters in advance doesn't always guarantee anything except in instances where we have prior data (nationals). Besides, kids get sick or don't show up to buses on time... rosters change...

TD's should also have the right to get the assurances from each coach that the spirit of assigning A and B teams to proper brackets is met. If the coach says, "Oh, my 'B' team is really my 'A' team", the TD should swap them at the team meeting.

Meanwhile, I do not advocate coach beat-downs for sandbagging. :)
Emil Thomas Chuck, Ph.D.
Founder, PACE
Facebook junkie and unofficial advisor to aspiring health professionals in quiz bowl
---
Pimping Green Tea Ginger Ale (Canada Dry)
User avatar
Stained Diviner
Auron
Posts: 4834
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Chicagoland
Contact:

Post by Stained Diviner »

I saw it happen once, though it was several years ago and I forget the exact details. The TD announced in the morning that A Teams should be better than B Teams. One of the top players in Illinois was on a B Team because that team's coach perceived that his A Team had a tougher bracket. Even though both teams earned a spot in the afternoon rounds, only one of them was allowed to play.

Don't ask me for names--I ain't saying.
Locked