Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Old college threads.
jonah
Auron
Posts: 2251
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:51 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by jonah » Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:59 am

dhumphreys17 wrote:
Ike wrote:Since you'll all be paying me by Venmo for the tournament
I know I have no real horse in this since this is CO, but whatever happened to "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE"?
The Treasury department explains.

Basically, paying for CO isn't a debt, since you can just choose not to pay it (and not play).
Jonah Greenthal
National Academic Quiz Tournaments

Urech hydantoin synthesis
Tidus
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:35 pm

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by Urech hydantoin synthesis » Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:20 pm

dhumphreys17 wrote:
Ike wrote:Since you'll all be paying me by Venmo for the tournament
I know I have no real horse in this since this is CO, but whatever happened to "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE"?
Well, since you'd be paying before the tournament, you're not paying off a debt.
Ben Zhang
Columbia '18 | Ladue '14
PACE member

User avatar
dhumphreys17
Wakka
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 3:16 pm

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by dhumphreys17 » Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:23 pm

Urech hydantoin synthesis wrote:
dhumphreys17 wrote:
Ike wrote:Since you'll all be paying me by Venmo for the tournament
I know I have no real horse in this since this is CO, but whatever happened to "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE"?
Well, since you'd be paying before the tournament, you're not paying off a debt.
Well there's your solution, anti-Venmo folks. Wait till after CO, establish a debt, then pay it off with cash as legal tender!
Devin James John Bartholomew Humphreys
Team Captain, Sacred Heart Academy High School (MI), Class of 2017
Michigan State University, anticipated Class of 2020

User avatar
Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 10:03 am

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode » Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:53 pm

dhumphreys17 wrote:
Urech hydantoin synthesis wrote:
dhumphreys17 wrote:
Ike wrote:Since you'll all be paying me by Venmo for the tournament
I know I have no real horse in this since this is CO, but whatever happened to "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE"?
Well, since you'd be paying before the tournament, you're not paying off a debt.
Well there's your solution, anti-Venmo folks. Wait till after CO, establish a debt, then pay it off with cash as legal tender!
uhhh, no.
Andrew Wang
Illinois 2016

User avatar
Ike
Yuna
Posts: 864
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by Ike » Sat Sep 03, 2016 1:23 pm

The point of this scheme is to collect money the week before the tournament so that come tournament day, we can get started ASAP, and not spend 30 minutes (1 round!) of time moping around.

I hope you can pay me by Venmo. If you can't, please have your teammate or someone else pay for me. It would be more inconvenient for me if you have to mail me a check, but I'll allow that if you conscientiously object to Venmo on principle. I'm being facetious about Venmo because Luddites loves to complain about it, despite the fact it's just as easy to have someone use it for you.
Ike
UIUC 13

User avatar
theMoMA
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5550
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by theMoMA » Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:59 pm

Between Venmo, having someone else Venmo (i.e. writing a check or paying cash to someone else, which I'm happy to facilitate), and pre-mailing a check, every method of payment except for credit cards should be easily available to anyone who wants to play CO. Hopefully we can put this tedious conversation to rest now.
Andrew Hart
Minnesota alum

User avatar
Mike Bentley
Auron
Posts: 5515
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by Mike Bentley » Sun Sep 04, 2016 9:05 am

gyre and gimble wrote:Let me illustrate with a couple of examples. 1) Of the 6/6 I submitted, I wrote what I thought was a pretty good tossup on Rembrandt's prints that I suspect was cut because the tournament already had a bonus part on Rembrandt and Rembrandt clues in the Poland tossup. I don't know exactly why it was cut but had I been the editor, I would have been fine keeping it in the tournament, as the quality was at least on par with those from my CO Visual Arts set.
Yeah this was a fine tossup that got cut because there was already 1/1 Rembrandt in the set (and, until I changed a tossup or two, too much work on prints/drawings).

Anyway, I personally found last year's submissions to be of a decent enough quality that there doesn't need to be a big change in the status quo, but if Ike wants to do that, go ahead. I dislike any proposal that caps the field by how good your team is or something like that.
Mike Bentley
Treasurer, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008

User avatar
Cheynem
Sin
Posts: 6289
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

Re: Packet Discount Policy for Chicago Open Discussion

Post by Cheynem » Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:21 pm

How do people feel Ike's discount policy worked?
Mike Cheyne
Formerly U of Minnesota

"You killed HSAPQ"--Matt Bollinger

Locked