cvdwightw wrote:Apparently sending a reminder to qb-westcoast awakens teams from their slumber!
Field update:
UCSD x1 D1
Stanford x?
Arizona State x3-4 D2
Claremont x1 D2
UCLA x1 D1 and possibly 1 D2
BYU x1 D2
I'm assuming D1 Undergrad, or do you have random people from Claremont grad schools too?Alejandro wrote:I misread the ACF eligibility rules; we're actually a DI team. Sorry about that.
cvdwightw wrote:We will begin play at 9:30 or whenever we end up getting into the rooms, whichever is earlier.

Sun Devil Student wrote:2) Would anyone here (in the Irvine/LA area) be able to accommodate some ASU team members for that Friday and Saturday night? Our student government won't even decide if they're giving us any money until this Friday and it may be too late to get (affordable) hotel rooms by then. We would only do this as a very last resort, not many of us appear to have friends in the Irvine area (that can take us in, anyway) so I'm now reduced to asking strangers for help in case we have nowhere else to go.
Thanks very much!
Worst case scenario the place that screws up our room reservations opens at 10:00 and we can fix things then (assuming, of course, that we don't lose our room reservation sheet, which has happened at least once before).Sun Devil Student wrote:cvdwightw wrote:We will begin play at 9:30 or whenever we end up getting into the rooms, whichever is earlier.
Wait, so if we don't get into the rooms by 9:30, we'll start playing in the hallway? That could be interesting.
7 is a really good number to have (we'd do our best to run as much of a double RR as possible in a reasonable time), and 8 is a really poor number to have, so unless I get a flurry of two teams that both want to come I'm declaring registration closed.cvdwightw wrote:Field update:
UCSD x1 D1
Stanford x1 D1
Arizona State x2 D2
Claremont x1 D1 Undergrad
UCLA x1 D1
BYU x1 D2
cvdwightw wrote:7 is a really good number to have (we'd do our best to run as much of a double RR as possible in a reasonable time), and 8 is a really poor number to have
Sun Devil Student wrote:cvdwightw wrote:7 is a really good number to have (we'd do our best to run as much of a double RR as possible in a reasonable time), and 8 is a really poor number to have
Wait, why is 7 better than 8? Don't both take the same number of rounds/packets, and with 7 teams there would have to be bye rounds?
Not that the ASU baby seals wouldn't appreciate the break, but I thought it was standard practice to avoid byes when possible. Either way, the double RR would be 14 rounds plus finals...right?
myamphigory wrote:Sun Devil Student wrote:cvdwightw wrote:7 is a really good number to have (we'd do our best to run as much of a double RR as possible in a reasonable time), and 8 is a really poor number to have
Wait, why is 7 better than 8? Don't both take the same number of rounds/packets, and with 7 teams there would have to be bye rounds?
Not that the ASU baby seals wouldn't appreciate the break, but I thought it was standard practice to avoid byes when possible. Either way, the double RR would be 14 rounds plus finals...right?
Some teams attending this tournament have submitted packets. Avoiding byes will not be possible, and single byes are preferable to double byes.
Sun Devil Student wrote:baby seals

Should be fixed now.
Return to Collegiate Announcements & Results
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest