FONS III

This is the only forum where you should post and discuss offers to have your tournament set hosted at other locations.
Post Reply
FortOsageScholarBowl
Lulu
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:46 pm

FONS III

Post by FortOsageScholarBowl » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:15 pm

They said it couldn't be done, and probably shouldn't be done, BUT, Fort Osage High School is OFFERING....

Its Novice Set III to mirror for the 2017-18 season (FONS III). The set is probably regular difficulty but we call it "Novice." It is intended for Freshmen and Sophomores, but who knows? It will be available from January-June 2018. It will consist of 11 packets of 20/20 (tossups/bonuses) with 1 tossup at the end as a tiebreaker (each packet will consist of 21 total tossups/20 bonuses). This set is simply another option for teams looking at a Novice competition for the 2017-18 school year (that is aimed at new high school players), and that's all... The set is powermarked and will consist of tossups of 5-7 lines (most will be 6 lines). The tossups should be easier this year but still on the more difficult side of Novice. The previous sets are listed below.

2015-16: http://www.quizbowlpackets.com/1836/
2016-17: http://www.quizbowlpackets.com/1943/

The distribution is as follows:

DISTRIBUTION:

4/4 Literature
4/4 History/Soc. Studies
3/3 Science
3/3 Geography
2/2 Fine Arts
2/2 Religion/Mythology
1/1 Non-comp. Math
1/1 Current Events
1/1 Trash

(Note: there are only 20 bonuses per round, so a Literature Or Hist/SS bonus will be left off on each packet)

COST:
The cost is $10 per team.
Josh Malecki
Fort Osage High School

User avatar
1.82
Rikku
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:35 pm
Location: Atlanta area
Contact:

Re: FONS III

Post by 1.82 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:09 pm

I have some questions about this announcement, since it is unclear in some places.
FortOsageScholarBowl wrote:The set is probably regular difficulty but we call it "Novice."
What does this mean? What is the intended difficulty for this set? By definition novice sets are easier than regular difficulty sets, so a set cannot be both regular difficulty and novice difficulty. Please clarify what difficulty the set will be written to, because from the tone of this post it is unclear that the set will be written to any specific difficulty at all, and hosts need to know what difficulty a set will be in order to market it to an appropriate audience. This brings us to the next point:
FortOsageScholarBowl wrote:It is intended for Freshmen and Sophomores, but who knows?
As the writers of the set, it's your job to know. If this is a set for freshmen and sophomores, please clarify that it is that and not a regular difficulty set. On the other hand, if it is a regular difficulty set designed to be playable by high schoolers of all grade levels, please indicate that. Thanks!
Naveed Chowdhury
Maryland '16
Georgia Tech '17

User avatar
Deviant Insider
Auron
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: FONS III

Post by Deviant Insider » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:14 pm

Has there been any constructive criticism based on past iterations of this set, and are any adjustments being made to the writing and editing of this year's set due to that criticism?
David Reinstein
Head Writer and Editor for Scobol Solo and Masonics (Illinois), TD for New Trier Scobol Solo and New Trier Varsity, Writer for NAQT (2011-2017), IHSSBCA Board Member, IHSSBCA Chair (2004-2014), PACE Member, PACE President (2016-2018), New Trier Coach (1994-2011)

User avatar
Progcon
Rikku
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:24 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by Progcon » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:19 pm

3/3 Geography seems extremely ambitious. Is there a reason you are using this distribution and aren't having stuff like Other Science or Philosophy in the set?
Harris Bunker
Grosse Pointe North High School '15
Michigan State University 2015-

FortOsageScholarBowl
Lulu
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:46 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by FortOsageScholarBowl » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:32 pm

Now for the answers:

1. I was being a tad sarcastic, since every time a set is posted, someone throws a fit that an "experienced editor" is not involved. Granted, I am not the world's best question writer and editor, but I'm also not Questions Galore either. I know some stuff and I don't think my set is terrible.

2. I intend it to be Novice, for Freshmen and Sophomores. Are the answerlines harder than your average Novice? Probably, but the Novice sets I've seen have similar difficulty to ours

3. We have done 2 iterations in the past, so we've learned as we've gone along; could they have been better? Absolutely! I am my own worst critic, so I know I can improve

4. I teach upper-level history so that is my specialty. I also do pretty well with Literature and Geography. I picked 3/3 Geography because, 1, very few question sets have that distribution, so we are different, 2, geography is something that EVERY kid has had by their Sophomore year. I am not as well versed on Science and Math, so those topics I depend on from my kids and other sources

5. Based on previous discussion, I would not touch Philosophy with a hundred foot pole, so there's that...

I hope this helps! Josh
Josh Malecki
Fort Osage High School

User avatar
Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode
Tidus
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 10:03 am

Re: FONS III

Post by Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:49 pm

FortOsageScholarBowl wrote:, geography is something that EVERY kid has had by their Sophomore year.
this is extremely "not true"
Andrew Wang
Illinois 2016

FortOsageScholarBowl
Lulu
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:46 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by FortOsageScholarBowl » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:00 pm

I am unaware of how Illinois covers geography, but we (at Fort Osage) cover it from 5-7th grade, and we thread it through every Social Studies class until 11th grade, when it becomes a stand-alone class. At schools surrounding us, it is a 9th grade required class. Needless, to say, how well it is covered, I cannot say...
Josh Malecki
Fort Osage High School

Karansebes Schnapps Vendor
Lulu
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:41 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by Karansebes Schnapps Vendor » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:11 pm

As someone who has been interested in getting a group of JV kids at my school interested, I looked through FONS II last year to see if I could use it in practice for JV. While I thought there were some interesting and well written tossups, there were a couple of big things that bothered me. For instance, there were multiple tossups on things I haven't really heard tossed up before in quizbowl (some I noticed quickly were the 26th amendment, Guyana and Beryllium, for instance.) In addition, there were tossups on answer lines that are definitely in the canon but not well known at the novice level (Lysistrata comes to mind for this). Will you be looking to keep answer lines like that to a minimum this year (or relegated to hard parts of bonuses)? One of my biggest qualms with the set was simply how many of the tossups would have gone dead if I were to read it to my novices. This is especially important because I think the community in general could benefit from more novice oriented question sets that truly stuck to the novice label and aimed for maximum answerability even for newcomers to the quizbowl canon (I know I for one would always love to have more novice material to read to my JV team at practice!)

I don't mean for this to come off as a critique at this year's iteration based off of last one's, but some of the things mentioned in this thread have definitely worried me, especially in regards to the seemingly jokingly defined difficulty. I think this set has a lot of potential, and I would definitely considering sending a team to a tournament running this set if some of these fears were quelled.
Vishwa Shanmugam
Downingtown STEM '18

alexdz
Rikku
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: FONS III

Post by alexdz » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:19 pm

There is definitely a concern about the difficulty level here, and I think that would be mitigated by having one more pair of eyes go through and excise the most difficult questions from the set. I understand the resistance to having an "experienced editor" come in and change everything you've worked on, but I'm not even saying that - literally just someone who wasn't involved in the early production of the set to look at stuff you've seen dozens of times and say, "hey, that's off-base compared to everything else here, let's try something a bit easier."

I'd like to make another suggestion, if I may. If you're committed to expanding geography to 3/3 but leaving out "other science," I'd suggest at least incorporating Earth science into geography. That is to say, more or less make it geography/geology.
Alex Dzurick
====
Owner/Editor, SAGES Quizbowl Questions
====
University of Illinois ('15-'17)
MOQBA Secretary ('08-'15) ::: MACA Vice President ('13-'15)
South Callaway MS/6th Grade Coach ('12-'13) ::: University of Missouri ('08-'12)
ACUI Region 11 Coordinator ('10-'11) ::: South Callaway HS ('04-'08)

nsb2
Lulu
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:05 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: FONS III

Post by nsb2 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:37 pm

It's hard not to admire your persistence, but I have two suggestions:

Since the distribution used in this set is different from what one might find in standard high school sets, you might not want to market this as "another option for teams looking at a Novice competition for the 2017-18 school year" -- it might be better to put it under the Miscellaneous High School Quizbowl section. In addition, it might help to provide a sample packet to show that you've incorporated the suggestions of more experienced writers and editors on the previous two editions this time around.
Pranav Sivakumar
Barrington Station MS '13, Barrington High School --> IMSA '17
UC Berkeley '21

User avatar
El Salvadoreno
Wakka
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:45 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs, IL

Re: FONS III

Post by El Salvadoreno » Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:35 am

nsb2 wrote:It's hard not to admire your persistence, but I have two suggestions:

Since the distribution used in this set is different from what one might find in standard high school sets, you might not want to market this as "another option for teams looking at a Novice competition for the 2017-18 school year" -- it might be better to put it under the Miscellaneous High School Quizbowl section. In addition, it might help to provide a sample packet to show that you've incorporated the suggestions of more experienced writers and editors on the previous two editions this time around.
I think its wrong to read this as persistence. This is an inability to take criticism. If this is supposed to be a SDI/Bork-esque tournament with a crazy distribution that is fine. But I am not reading this as that. I am reading this as a bird-flip to the very fair critiques of the first two FONS sets, and that is not good. As for ways to improve the set, it has mostly been stated above.

On geography, there is a reason a set that wants to be legitimate (i.e. not vanity) does not have 3/3 geography. It is not as important as other subjects and does not have as big a canon, especially at the novice level (unless you really think 9-10 graders, or any high-schoolers can that matter, can answer questions on Guyana and Djibouti).

I would also support a sample packet.
Ricky "Slick Rick/Rico Suave" Rivera
Carmel Catholic- Class of '17
Notre Dame (Mendoza)- Class of '21

My Namesake

nsb2
Lulu
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:05 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: FONS III

Post by nsb2 » Tue Oct 17, 2017 12:45 pm

El Salvadoreno wrote: I think its wrong to read this as persistence. This is an inability to take criticism.
I agree with the above statement -- I was merely trying to be less overt and state my position in a more constructive way.
Pranav Sivakumar
Barrington Station MS '13, Barrington High School --> IMSA '17
UC Berkeley '21

FortOsageScholarBowl
Lulu
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:46 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by FortOsageScholarBowl » Tue Oct 17, 2017 5:15 pm

Gentlemen,
Rest assured, in my 18 years of teaching and coaching Scholar Bowl, I have taken plenty of criticism, so I have the ability to do it. I posted this yesterday, but for some reason, it did not go through. I have played and/or coached Scholar Bowl since 1994. I get the game, and the district where I teach is a blue-collar district with no IB programs, and barely an AP program. My kids know they have to work harder than those better-off districts that surround us. They put in the work, they write questions, they practice all the time. We fight hard and hustle for everything we have. We have made Nationals 2 of the 6 years I have coached at the High School. We will do our best to put out the best set we can.
Josh Malecki
Fort Osage High School

Karansebes Schnapps Vendor
Lulu
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:41 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by Karansebes Schnapps Vendor » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:23 pm

FortOsageScholarBowl wrote:Gentlemen,
Rest assured, in my 18 years of teaching and coaching Scholar Bowl, I have taken plenty of criticism, so I have the ability to do it. I posted this yesterday, but for some reason, it did not go through. I have played and/or coached Scholar Bowl since 1994. I get the game, and the district where I teach is a blue-collar district with no IB programs, and barely an AP program. My kids know they have to work harder than those better-off districts that surround us. They put in the work, they write questions, they practice all the time. We fight hard and hustle for everything we have. We have made Nationals 2 of the 6 years I have coached at the High School. We will do our best to put out the best set we can.
I didn't (and I don't believe anyone else did) mean to attack the work ethic of you or your students. In fact, I think it speaks volumes that you are making the best of your situation and writing a set, which is a commitment a lot of schools can't make (my school decided against it, for instance). However, given the history of the set, I personally have a hard time accepting hand-waving responses like this one that vaguely promise the set will be better. I think that's one of the reasons I, as well as many others, want a sample packet or other assurances of quality (an outside editor who has a proven track record, for instance); not because we doubt you are hard workers capable of writing a set but because we want some way to have our trust restored, or to point out problems early on that can be nipped in the bud. I want to stress that I think this set could absolutely be good given how much work you are willing to put into it, but IMHO vague responses that don't assuage community fears about this set's previous problems and seem to brush them off don't instill trust in the community at large.
Vishwa Shanmugam
Downingtown STEM '18

User avatar
El Salvadoreno
Wakka
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:45 am
Location: Northwest Suburbs, IL

Re: FONS III

Post by El Salvadoreno » Wed Oct 18, 2017 10:59 am

FortOsageScholarBowl wrote:Gentlemen,
Rest assured, in my 18 years of teaching and coaching Scholar Bowl, I have taken plenty of criticism, so I have the ability to do it. I posted this yesterday, but for some reason, it did not go through. I have played and/or coached Scholar Bowl since 1994. I get the game, and the district where I teach is a blue-collar district with no IB programs, and barely an AP program. My kids know they have to work harder than those better-off districts that surround us. They put in the work, they write questions, they practice all the time. We fight hard and hustle for everything we have. We have made Nationals 2 of the 6 years I have coached at the High School. We will do our best to put out the best set we can.
Thank you for proving my point. Instead of offering any substantive response you just play the "don't pretend to know what I go through" card. Good quizbowl is the same regardless of race, class or gender. So if you are going to write a set, do it right or not at all.

As for another suggestion: if you are unwilling to bring on another editor, you could playtest the questions with the people on this forum. I am sure they would be willing to help.
Ricky "Slick Rick/Rico Suave" Rivera
Carmel Catholic- Class of '17
Notre Dame (Mendoza)- Class of '21

My Namesake

FortOsageScholarBowl
Lulu
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:46 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by FortOsageScholarBowl » Wed May 02, 2018 2:49 pm

This set will be posted soon.

There will be a 4th incarnation next year...
Josh Malecki
Fort Osage High School

User avatar
Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode
Tidus
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 10:03 am

Re: FONS III

Post by Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode » Wed May 02, 2018 8:57 pm

will there be more stuff like this next year?
Image
Andrew Wang
Illinois 2016

FortOsageScholarBowl
Lulu
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:46 pm

Re: FONS III

Post by FortOsageScholarBowl » Wed May 02, 2018 11:39 pm

Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode wrote:will there be more stuff like this next year?
Image
Possibly...although I will make sure I write the correct answerline this time...
Last edited by FortOsageScholarBowl on Thu May 03, 2018 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Josh Malecki
Fort Osage High School

User avatar
An Economic Ignoramus
Memerator
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:31 pm
Location: East Lansing, MI or Naperville, IL

Re: FONS III

Post by An Economic Ignoramus » Thu May 03, 2018 10:52 am

FortOsageScholarBowl wrote:
Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode wrote:will there be more stuff like this next year?
Image
Possibly...
That's probably not a good thing given that they're different museums https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropoli ... eum_of_Art
Jakob Myers
MSU '21, Naperville North '17
"No one has ever organized a greater effort to get people interested in pretending to play quiz bowl"
-Ankit Aggarwal
Member, PACE
Memerator

Post Reply